Ethical Theory Overview and Assessment
|
Theory |
Utilitarianism |
Kantianism |
Social Contract |
Virtue |
Pragmatism |
|
Account of Morality |
impartial good/bad outcomes |
universal (in scope) consistent willing
|
product of action-guiding societal decisions hypthetical or actual |
admirable/beneficial character traits; experientiallyoriented |
deliberately chosen goods as embodied in habits/practices; experientially oriented |
|
How we know what to do/be |
empirically apparently but covertly rational |
rationally
|
rationally |
empirically |
empirically and through intelligence (means-ends analysis and reconstruction)
|
|
Action-guiding and character-forming |
consequentially determined |
rationally determined by the categorical imperative
|
rules self-imposed by the society |
character-driven |
revises problematic practices through deliberation but no formula |
|
Justification Motivation (authority of ethics) |
objective prescriptivity |
objective prescriptivity |
rational self-interest |
humans find these traits attractive/beneficial
|
interest-driven |
|
Evaluation
|
overly rational despite its empirical orientation; pyschologically unrealistic; motivationally challenged |
overly rational; pyschologically unrealistic; motivationally challenged |
overly rational; pyschologically unrealistic; motivationally challenged |
incomplete (not directly action guiding) but psychologically plausible; no motivation problem |
psychologically plausible; no motivation problem but obligation-challenged |
Some final considerations:
· course is misnamed: should be “Contemporary Ethical Theory” or “Contemporary Moral and Ethical Theory” where “moral” focuses on the interpersonal and “ethical” on the development of character
· moral theories as tools rather than authorities; as such they are crucial to the good life